NASA In Jeopardy: Has Presidential Policy Killed NASA?

Posted by: Mike Pallante on February 17, 2011 at 12:08PM

shuttle on launch pad
Somewhere in Florida a NASA technician is repairing the space shuttle Discovery for the final time. Policies of George W. Bush and President Barrack Obama have dismantled the space shuttle program. Bush's space policy grounded our shuttle fleet but offered no funding or encouragement for the replacement vehicles outlined in the Constellation Program. Last year, President Obama effectively dismantled the Constellation Program and instead plans to replace our shuttle fleet with private industry. So far no exact, or working, timetable exists for future manned space flights originating from the United States. With NASA's future unclear it'd be a wonder if researchers weren't following the Discovery's lead and starting to crack under pressure.


Discovery's Technical Woes


The space shuttle Discovery, STS-133, is cracking up. Perhaps the pressure of retirement is getting to the old craft. Discovery's next mission, a resupply mission to the international space station, will be the shuttle's final endeavor. However, on November 5, 2010 technicians discovered a crack in Discovery's Ground Umbilical Carrier Plate or GUCP. The GUCP, according to NASA, is at the end of a service arm responsible for clearing excess liquid hydrogen during fueling the external tanks of the spacecraft. NASA considers the GUCP critical to ground level preparations for liftoff and after the criticism of NASA safety procedures following the 2003 Columbia disaster they aren't taking chances.

discovery shuttle repair
Unfortunately for the Discovery, two more cracks were found on the fuel tanks themselves. On December 17th NASA began a tanking test. Filling the Discovery's orange external fuel tanks with liquid-oxygen and hydrogen a series of 89 sensors registered four more cracks in the tank. The tank has since been taken to the Vehicle Assembly Building for repairs and further testing. Discovery's final flight is scheduled to occur no sooner than February 24, 2011. According to a press release dated January 13, 2011 NASA is targeting 4:50 p.m. EST on Thursday February 24, for the launch of space shuttle Discovery's STS-133 mission to the International Space Station.


NASA Dismantled by Policy & Neglect


George Bush Nasa Logo
The future of Discovery's launch is not the only uncertainty at NASA these days. Since President George W. Bush's January 14 2004 speech on the future of space policy, a number of questions have lingered. Bush's speech outlined a plan for space exploration that began with returning to the moon by 2020 and from there to manned missions to Mars and beyond. Bush's speech came less than a year after the Columbia disaster as an attempt to rescue popular opinion of NASA. At the time space flight was still suspended as the Columbia incident was investigated. The result of President Bush's new space policy was the Constellation Program.


Constellation: Moon, Mars and Malaise


The Constellation Program called for the retirement of NASA's space shuttle fleet no later than 2011. Future space flight, under constellation, would be carried out through a series of new exploratory crafts including the Orion and Altair, with Ares I and V booster rockets. The Ares I would deliver its payload, Orion and crew, into low earth orbit while the Ares V would deliver its payload, the Altair and supplies shortly after.

Constellation Ares I V
President Bush's Constellation program suffered setbacks. First, NASA was unable to provide a long term budget for the Constellation Program. Second, Bush failed to allocate enough funds to begin practical implementation of Constellation projects. Third, a curious gap resulted from the timetable. In 2011 the space shuttle program would end- completely. However America's commitment to the International Space Station would continue until 2015. President Bush did not support the Russian Space Program's transportation of NASA astronauts or equipment. By ending the space shuttle program, Bush essentially abandoned the international space station, refusing to fund his own program. Adding salt to the wound, Bush also set the unreasonable and convoluted “moon first” path to Mars, crippling NASA's ability to explore space.

In 2008 President Bush did sign legislation extending limited space shuttle use in 2011 and beyond. But to what end?


Enter Obama: Exit Constellation


President Obama and Ex President Bush
After five years of scientific malaise President Barrack Obama, seeing NASA in a tough situation, announced a new space policy. Scrapping all but a few elements of Bush's Constellation Program, President Obama outlined the future of manned space flight: Private Industry.

Under President Obama's new space policy NASA would dictate what they want a space craft to do and pay private developers to build it. This plan allows NASA to get out of the “Space Taxi” business allowing NASA teams to conduct pure research and development. However, unless NASA makes its current designs public, which as of yet seems unlikely, private industry will be reinventing the wheel so to speak.


Critics, Buzz Aldrin and the Future of NASA


Skeptics of the new plan rightfully point out that private industry has had zero success in manned space flight. However, private rocket launches are often profit driven and necessarily cheaper than government launches. President Obama believes that by farming out manned space flight to private industry, development and launch costs will free up funds for pure research at NASA.

Astronaut Buzz Aldrin, famous for being among the crew of the Apollo 11 lunar mission and for punching out a man who questioned the moon landing, has been optimistic of President Obama's new space initiative.

buzz aldrin
“I continue to be excited about the development of commercial capabilities to send humans into low earth orbit and what this could ultimately mean in terms of allowing others to experience the transformative power of spaceflight. I can personally attest to what such an experience can do in creating a different perspective regarding our life on Earth and on our future. I applaud the President for his boldness and commitment in working to make this worthwhile dream a reality.“

Currently limited use of space shuttles will continue; however, for Discovery the end is near. The Discovery is coming apart at the seams and NASA's future is uncertain. Unanswered questions still remain regarding private sector space travel. Will private industry succeed in manned space flight? When? President Obama's plan extends the orbit of the International Space Station until 2020 but potentially leaves us without a means to get there. During the Constellation Program days NASA canceled many contracts for replacement shuttle parts. The wisdom and expense of continual repair on shuttles like Discovery is in question.

If President Obama is serious about the future of NASA he will have to do what President Bush did not: Follow through with his vision and create the infrastructure needed to accomplish his goals. That will require allocation of funds, a potentially unpopular move in a budget-heavy political climate. The next year will be an important one for NASA and space travel in general. How it will end remains to be seen.

Filed under: Blogs, nasa, STS133, discovery, Constellation, obama, bush, florida, Ares I, Ares V, Orion, Space shuttle, Vehicle Assembly Building, VAB, Space Station, Altair, Payload, mars, Orbit, moon, earth, Crew, budget, 2008, 2010, 2011, space flight, private industry, Buzz Aldrin, Moon Landing 3 Comments

Comments

  • The Dom
  • -  170 pts
  • -  (1 year ago)

Good article. Interesting, isn't it, we haven't even really heard from NASA in quite a long time. I remember when we used to hear of them in the news quite often here. I mean, I don't really care about us going to the moon again - big deal - but the prospect of developing stasis, faster-than-light travel, and other such things of science fiction which will allow us to reach distant planets, make me excited for the future.

However, if NASA are pushed behind the couch, we'll probably never see any of those things. We'll never make it to "the final frontier," and the human race won't reach it's full potential. Call me a geek, but I'd love to see us having the opportunity to set up civilisations on other planets. Moreso if we find planets that have the same conditions as Earth.

Probably not in our lifetime though. /sigh

  • mikep
  • -  147 pts
  • -  (1 year ago)

Dom- I wrote a lengthy essay on the reasons behind the decline of NASA- Mostly its political. NASA has been, at least to the public, a military deterrent and political weapon more than a research facility. When our social "enemy" was Communism we were fighting against an industrialized nation. Our technology said to Russia, "We've been to the moon. And back. A lot. What ELSE can we do?"

Now the "bogie" is terrorists- who took down the twin towers with box cutters and willpower. If you delve into the writings of bin-Laden they take pride that they have no need for technology. They aren't frightened by our military and scientific might. If anything we are more of a target for it. They tell young al-Qaeda that, much like batman, we have "Nothing to do with all our strength." as the Joker said.

Then there was Challenger. By the time NASA was making manned space flights after Challenger the Warsaw Treaty was dissolving. Suddenly NASA was less a point of pride but a matter of fact.

Then there was Discovery. After 2001's 9/11 attacks America questioned why we were even bothering with NASA- what good was pure scientific research and the limits of human capacity when we were in a constant state of terror? America was vulnerable! Dear god- put that money into fighting al-Qaeda in Iraq (???????) instead of playing space-man!

NASA ceased to be a military deterrent. The public was more concerned about "national security" than science. Eight years under a near-religious-regime soured us on science. Our new Enemy thinks the moon landings only happened because Allah opened a hole in the sky through which are ships could travel. Challenger and Columbia displeased Allah.

In short... NASA went the way of Haiti, Indonesia, Somolia... "Why are we worrying about stuff out there when we have problems here at home?"

Or at least that's the "soup-in-a-can" condensed version of it.

  • Guest
  • -  0 pts
  • -  (9 months ago)

George Bush was faced with a new congressional reality after Democrats retook the House and Senate. He was faced with the option of funding the "surge" and winning the insurgency in Iraq, or fully funding CxP. Bush chose to win in Iraq.

The choice was forced upon him, and it was a calculated political move by his nemeses in the House and Senate. In the mind of democrats at the time wither way was a win politically. If Bush lost Iraq he owned it and they regained the presidency, if Bush lost Constellation he got no credit for expanding our space mission and had a solid chance at killing the program whole sale. That would be a win for democrats as the majority of states that supported the space industry were Blue states.

It was political gamesman ship that killed Constellation. And it will be the next Republican president that will restore it.

What is Questional?

We interview experts, scientists, and public figures in tech & science as well as community Q & A!

Asking questions and getting answers is what we do.

Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via Email

About The Author

Mike Pallante

Mike Pallante is writer, satirical artist and full time geek who finds that reading books is nearly always the best way to learn nearly anything.

Request For Interview

Questional is always on the lookout for great interviewees.

If you're a professional, an expert, or feel like your interview would be a great read to our guests + members we want to hear from you! - Contact Us